Federal Law Gambling
- Federal Law Against Online Gambling
- Federal Law Prohibiting Gambling
- Federal Law Gambling
- Federal Law Online Gambling
- Federal Law Gambling Age
- Federal Law Sports Betting
Gambling Winnings A payer is required to issue you a Form W-2G, Certain Gambling Winnings PDF if you receive certain gambling winnings or have any gambling winnings subject to federal income tax withholding. Withholding on Gambling Winnings. Gambling winnings are subject to withholding for federal income tax at a rate of 24% as of 2020 if you win more than $5,000 from sweepstakes, wagering pools, lotteries, or other wagering transactions, or anytime the winnings are at least 300 times the amount wagered.
There are actually several federal statutes that are targeted towards gambling in general and may also apply to online gambling as well. The real challenge with these laws is to first establish the criminality of the acts in question and then apply federal laws to punish certain aspects of them, such as the transmission of bets or financial transactions resulting from illegal gambling.
So when we look at these federal laws, it usually comes down to whether the gambling in question is legal or not in the first place, and we generally require a finding of criminality before the various acts kick in so to speak.
We do know that interstate commerce is under the domain of the individual states, and the federal government has power over interstate and foreign commerce, so if interstate or foreign means are used in gambling, this would put the activity under the purview of the federal government.
Federal Law Against Online Gambling
So in theory anyway, they could render illegal any gambling activity other than which occurs exclusively within one of the states. There’s only really been one attempt to render such a law, back in 1999, and if passed this would have made all interstate betting illegal, both the placing of bets by players and the operation of businesses taking these interstate bets.
However, casino-style gambling is much less widespread. Federal law provides leeway for Native American Trust Land to be used for games of chance if an agreement is put in place between the State and the Tribal Government (e.g. A 'Compact' or 'Agreement') under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. New Jersey wants to allow limited forms of sports gambling and to collect the taxes from it. While supporters of the federal law said it discouraged betting and the resulting corrupting influence. The Federal government has designated some forms of gambling as prohibited within the US and has created laws that are non-negotiable in the regulation of such prohibited activities. On this subject, the Federal government may outlaw any form of gambling and states must abide by their law as Federal regulation will always trump state laws.
What if the gambling in question was between two states where gambling was legal though, such as New Jersey and Nevada for instance? Well that wouldn’t matter, they could still make the exchange of betting between these states illegal, if they really wanted to that is.
So the attempt to make interstate online gambling illegal was defeated, back in the early days of online gambling actually, and we haven’t seen any real attempt to try again, aside from the recent effort to restore the Wire Act, which isn’t even a restoration as the Wire Act never had such broad powers.
Some may want to make the argument that the internet itself is by its very nature purely under the federal domain, but these arguments are weak as if the transmissions are within a state, it’s hard to imagine how the federal government could be seen to have legal standing with them.
What Can The Federal Government Really Do?
Federal Law Prohibiting Gambling
After very limited success in going after offshore gambling, some now want to go after the regulated online gambling that is emerging, with more on the horizon. The fact that pulling this off is really beyond their legal powers does not serve as much of a deterrent for some at least.
For now, the government is really limited to regulating activity that there are already laws on the books making them illegal, which from a federal perspective is limited to interstate sports betting. There’s a whole lot of interstate sports betting that goes on though, so the effect of these laws are quite limited indeed, in spite of some celebrated convictions years ago where the parties did not exercise appropriate caution.
In addition to the Wire Act, there are several other federal laws that may be invoked against online gambling, but all of them are dependent on the gambling in question being already illegal.
So these laws address not gambling, but illegal gambling, for instance the UIGEA’s prohibiting financial transactions related to illegal gambling.
Federal Law Gambling
Some Other Acts That May Apply To Online Gambling
In a real sense, these other laws aren’t really required, given that the acts themselves are illegal, and must be found to be in order to proceed with these supplementary charges. However they can serve to broaden the scope of the actions taken, for instance in forming a legal basis for the seizing of funds that we have seen.
So in addition to the well publicized UIGEA, there’s also the Prohibition of Illegal Gambling Business Act of 1955, which prohibits the operation of illegal gambling businesses. This law is surely redundant though, as if the business already involves running illegal gambling, the law that rendered it illegal in the first place would be more than sufficient for a conviction, and this act adds nothing meaningful to the law.
Federal Law Online Gambling
This doesn’t stop federal authorities from invoking it though, like for instance in the actions known as Black Friday against several online poker sites, and this in fact was the prevailing federal law that was cited in the indictments. So it did serve a purpose, but not a legitimate one, but since they couldn’t cite the Wire Act since it doesn’t apply to poker, they had to cite something.
Occasionally, the Travel Act of 1952 is referenced in conjunction with online gambling, although this act is limited to either use of the mail or physical travel in conjunction with preexisting illegal activity. This could apply to the mailing of checks for withdrawals from gambling sites though if the gambling activity in question was illegal.
The Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 is felt by some at least to apply to online gambling organizations, and in some cases it might, but this again depends on a prior finding of illegality. So someone who is under the control of United States law who is found to be operating an illegal gambling operation could be charged under this act, although once again, laws like this are redundant really.
There’s also a section of U.S. Code, specifically Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 95, Section 1960, which prohibits “illegal money transmitting businesses,” which third party processors could be held subject to, in spite of their being outside the scope of the UIGEA. This is limited to going after businesses which do not have the appropriate state license though, and therefore aims at purely criminal organizations and not the licensed processors that tend to be involved in gambling proceeds.
Federal Law Gambling Age
So there are several federal laws which authorities could potentially use to go after online gambling operators, to the extent that they find themselves or their funds within the reach of U.S. authorities, but the lack of this generally is the main stumbling block by far in these efforts.
Federal Law Sports Betting
Having these gambling operators residing in other jurisdictions with different laws and the fact that none of this is enforceable under international law or international treaties, which has been well established, ensures that any fight that the U.S. government takes on here will be one that is going to be pretty limited in scope.